How do strikes affect history students in UK universities?

By Student Voice Analytics
strike actionhistory

Strikes drive a strongly negative student experience for history in UK universities. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the UK-wide student survey, the strike action theme records only 3.4% positive comments and a sentiment index of −57.1; within history, strike-related remarks account for 4.6% of all comments with an even lower index of −63.1, concentrated among full-time cohorts who contribute 95.3% of strike-action comments. These signals show why disrupted seminars, timetabling changes and unsettled assessments hit this discipline hard and set the standard for effective mitigation.

How do history students’ expectations of continuity shape the impact of strikes?

History students synthesise complex narratives across periods and geographies, so breaks in continuity undermine learning. They expect integrated lectures, seminar debate and resource access to connect themes and timelines. When activity stops, students struggle to link ideas and sustain momentum. Student voice should inform institutional decisions during industrial action so programme teams maintain educational quality and continuity.

How do strikes affect academic performance?

Loss of lectures and seminars removes the structured debate and guidance that underpin analysis in history. Students must rely on self-study, which rarely substitutes for seminar-led critique. Known pressure points around assessment (particularly understanding marking criteria and assessment methods) become more acute when contact is lost, reducing preparedness for exams and coursework. Universities should pre-plan catch-up windows, provide equivalent activities and resources, stabilise assessment briefs and timelines, and make alternative formats available where needed.

Where does communication break down during strikes?

Students frequently report uncertainty about which sessions run, what moves online, and how deadlines change. A single, always-up-to-date source of truth that explains what changed, why, and next steps reduces confusion. Concise weekly (or daily during action) updates and module-level notices help students organise revision and manage expectations.

What are the financial implications for history students?

When teaching stops, students question value for money and how fees relate to disrupted delivery. Institutions should be transparent about what is affected, what is protected, and how lost learning is recovered. Where feasible, credits or other remedies for unrecoverable contact time can be considered alongside measures that sustain quality and progression.

What support and resources sustain learning during strikes?

Strengthen digital provision: recorded lectures, curated reading routes, digitised archives and research tools tailored to history. Maintain accessible academic support through virtual office hours and timely email guidance so students can check interpretation and plan work. Engage students in co-designing mitigation for their modules; this ensures resources and adjustments align with their needs.

What are the long-term educational impacts?

Extended disruption risks gaps in knowledge, weaker preparation for dissertations and finals, and delays to progression. Independent study skills may improve, but without structured exchange students miss formative challenge and scholarly community. Support should prioritise recovery of conceptual links across modules and transparent plans for assessment coverage.

What should universities do next?

  • Map lost teaching hours and match them to recovery actions per module; track and close student-reported issues, and publish closure rates and timelines.
  • Protect assessment stability with consistent deadline policies and explicit marking timelines, and align feedback to marking criteria.
  • Target mitigation where volume is highest (large history cohorts and first-year modules), while ensuring parity across groups.
  • Maintain robust course-level communications and involve student representatives in a standing crisis group to inform timetabling, resources and assessment adjustments.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics quantifies topics and sentiment about strike action across cohorts and subjects, with drill-downs from provider to school and programme. It surfaces subject-level patterns for history and key demographics so you can target mitigation where it will move sentiment most. The platform tracks themes such as feedback, marking criteria, teaching quality, and module choice over time, benchmarks against sector peers, and produces concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams, unions and committees. Export-ready tables and briefings make it straightforward to evidence recovery actions, communicate progress and support governance.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on strike action:

More posts on history student views:

© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.