Student Voice Analytics for Music — UK student feedback 2018–2025

Scope. UK NSS open-text comments for Music (CAH25-02-02) students across academic years 2018–2025.
Volume. ≈2,211 comments; 97.3% successfully categorised to a single primary topic.
Overall mood. Roughly 55.6% Positive, 41.6% Negative, 2.9% Neutral (positive:negative ≈ 1.34:1).

What students are saying

Music students talk most about the day-to-day environment and their direct interactions with staff. Comments on General facilities are unusually prominent (≈9.1% share vs 1.8% sector) and distinctly positive (sentiment index ≈+35.1). Teaching Staff also feature heavily (≈8.9%) with a strong positive tone (≈+44.0), above sector on both visibility and sentiment.

Beyond facilities and people, students focus on the Type and breadth of course content (≈7.0%). The tone here is moderately positive but sits below the sector norm, suggesting some desire for clearer fit or balance in what is offered. Student support is visible and well-regarded (≈+19.4, above sector), while Personal development and Student life are clear strengths, both attracting positive, future-facing comments.

Assessment & feedback continues to pull sentiment down. Feedback (≈5.4% share) is net negative (≈−13.5), typically when examples, criteria and turnaround feel unclear or inconsistent. Marking criteria is both smaller by share (≈2.5%) and substantially negative (≈−47.4). Assessment methods (≈2.0%) is slightly negative overall but compares better than the sector.

Operational topics are less dominant here than in many subjects. The delivery and operations cluster—Scheduling, Organisation & management, Course communications, Remote learning and Placements—accounts for about 10.4% of comments, but the tone is generally negative, particularly for Remote learning (≈−28.7) and Organisation & management (≈−23.9). Placements/fieldwork are relatively rare in this discipline (≈1.2% vs 3.4% sector) and near‑neutral in tone.

Top categories by share (Music vs sector)

Category Section Share % Sector % Δ pp Sentiment idx Δ vs sector
General facilities Learning resources 9.1 1.8 7.3 35.1 11.6
Teaching Staff The teaching on my course 8.9 6.7 2.1 44.0 8.5
Type and breadth of course content Learning opportunities 7.0 6.9 0.1 11.4 −11.2
Student support Academic support 6.1 6.2 −0.1 19.4 6.2
Feedback Assessment and feedback 5.4 7.3 −1.9 −13.5 1.6
COVID-19 Others 5.0 3.3 1.7 −29.8 3.1
Personal development Learning community 4.9 2.5 2.5 55.3 −4.5
Module choice / variety Learning opportunities 4.5 4.2 0.3 24.3 6.9
Delivery of teaching The teaching on my course 4.0 5.4 −1.4 4.9 −3.9
Student life Learning community 3.6 3.2 0.5 47.4 15.3

Most negative categories (share ≥ 2%)

Category Section Share % Sector % Δ pp Sentiment idx Δ vs sector
Marking criteria Assessment and feedback 2.5 3.5 −1.0 −47.4 −1.7
Costs / Value for money Others 2.2 1.6 0.6 −46.5 6.3
COVID-19 Others 5.0 3.3 1.7 −29.8 3.1
Remote learning The teaching on my course 2.9 3.5 −0.6 −28.7 −19.7
Organisation, management of course Organisation and management 2.7 3.3 −0.7 −23.9 −10.0
Scheduling/ timetabling Organisation and management 2.1 2.9 −0.7 −14.7 1.8
Feedback Assessment and feedback 5.4 7.3 −1.9 −13.5 1.6

Shares are the proportion of all Music comments whose primary topic is the category. Sentiment index ranges from −100 (more negative than positive) to +100 (more positive than negative).

Most positive categories (share ≥ 2%)

Category Section Share % Sector % Δ pp Sentiment idx Δ vs sector
Personal development Learning community 4.9 2.5 2.5 55.3 −4.5
Student life Learning community 3.6 3.2 0.5 47.4 15.3
Teaching Staff The teaching on my course 8.9 6.7 2.1 44.0 8.5
General facilities Learning resources 9.1 1.8 7.3 35.1 11.6
Career guidance, support Learning community 3.5 2.4 1.1 28.5 −1.5
Learning resources Learning resources 2.1 3.8 −1.6 25.7 4.2
Opportunities to work with other students Learning community 2.4 2.0 0.4 25.4 24.4

What this means in practice

  • Keep investing in what works. Facilities and staff interactions are clear strengths. Make it easy for students to access well-maintained spaces, and keep visibility of staff availability high—these are high-impact positives in the experience.

  • Tighten assessment clarity. Publish annotated exemplars, checklist-style rubrics and realistic, trackable turnaround times. This directly addresses the most negative elements (marking criteria and feedback) and tends to lift overall sentiment quickly.

  • Reduce operational friction. Even though operational topics are a smaller share here, the tone is negative. A single source of truth for course communications, clear ownership of timetables and changes, and predictable processes for online/remote components will pay off.

  • Support connection and growth. Students value personal development and the wider student experience. Preserve time and structure for peer collaboration and co-curricular activities; these are consistently positive and differentiate the experience.

Data at a glance (2018–2025)

  • Top topics by share: General facilities (≈9.1%), Teaching Staff (≈8.9%), Type and breadth of course content (≈7.0%), Student support (≈6.1%), Feedback (≈5.4%), COVID‑19 (≈5.0%).
  • Cluster view:
    • Delivery & ops cluster (Placements/fieldwork, Scheduling, Organisation & management, Course communications, Remote learning): ≈10.4% of all comments, generally negative in tone.
    • People & growth cluster (Personal Tutor, Student support, Teaching Staff, Availability of teaching staff, Delivery of teaching, Personal development, Student life): ≈30.3%, strongly positive overall.
  • How to read the numbers. Each comment is assigned one primary topic; share is that topic’s proportion of all comments. Sentiment is calculated per sentence and summarised as an index from −100 to +100, then averaged at category level.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns open-text survey comments into clear, prioritised actions. It tracks topics and sentiment over time for all disciplines, including Music (CAH25-02-02), so programme and school teams can focus on the categories that move the dial—assessment clarity, operational reliability and strengths worth protecting.

It also enables like-for-like sector comparisons across CAH codes and by demographics (e.g., year of study, domicile, mode of study, campus/site, commuter status), so you can evidence change relative to the right peer group—not just the whole sector. Use it across the whole institution and drill down to departments and schools; produce concise, anonymised theme summaries for partners and programme teams; segment by site/provider, cohort and year; and export shareable outputs for reports, decks and dashboards.

Insights into specific areas of music education