Student perspectives on teaching delivery in civil engineering

By Student Voice

Introduction

This blog post looks into the various concerns raised by students studying civil engineering regarding the quality and method of their educational delivery. A key issue among these includes the impact of staff mergers, the adequacy of teaching methods, and the effectiveness of online learning platforms. Starting the educational process in civil engineering poses its unique set of challenges and opportunities. Institutions are increasingly integrating student feedback mechanisms such as surveys and text analysis to better understand student needs. This input is important for refining teaching methods and course content, ensuring it is responsive and beneficial. Utilising student voice can lead to significant improvements in teaching delivery, especially in specialised subjects like civil engineering. The transition to hybrid educational models has also changed the traditional classroom setting, integrating digital tools that foster a more flexible learning environment. On one hand, this flexibility is welcomed, but it also raises questions about consistent access and engagement levels among students. As we look further into these challenges, it is key to continually evaluate the effectiveness of these new models and consider their long-term sustainability in delivering quality education.

Impact of Faculty Mergers

The recent mergers within civil engineering departments have led to significant changes in the teaching environment. These mergers often result in a reduction in the number of specialised educators available, which can directly impact the delivery of teaching. For instance, the sharing or redistribution of staff between merged entities has, in many cases, diluted the specialist knowledge that is so important in delivering high-quality, technical education. Some civil engineering students have noted a decline in the depth of interaction they have with lecturers who possess expert knowledge in specific areas of civil engineering. This raises concerns about how well current educational delivery aligns with the needs of the industry, which relies heavily on specialised skills. Conversely, some argue that mergers can lead to a pooling of resources that might enhance research opportunities and technological advancements in teaching. For example, larger departments can often invest in better teaching facilities and software, potentially benefiting student learning in the long run. However, feedback from students, gathered through surveys, suggests that the immediacy of personal academic support and specialised course delivery has suffered. These concerns imply that institutions need to be thoughtful about maintaining a balance between expanding resources and preserving quality, hands-on education that civil engineering students find so valuable.

Teaching of Engineering Drawings

Engineering drawings are a fundamental aspect of civil engineering education, serving as the blueprint for constructing civil infrastructures. However, students have expressed concerns about the quality of instruction in this critical area, particularly pointing out the need for a deeper understanding of both traditional hand-drawing techniques and modern software tools like AutoCAD. The challenge here is twofold; on one hand, there is a clear demand for thorough grounding in manual drawing skills, which are essential for foundational knowledge and often demanded by more traditional sectors of the industry. Conversely, proficiency in software such as AutoCAD is equally important as the industry progresses towards digital solutions. It's important to note that each method serves different but complementary purposes in the field of civil engineering. Given these distinct needs, academic staff are tasked with a complex balancing act: integrating both forms of learning to cater effectively to the varied demands of the sector. Discussions with students highlight a desire for more interactive and application-focused teaching approaches that could enhance their understanding and retention of complex drawing techniques. Thereby, it seems beneficial for institutions to look into developing curriculum models that promote both technical precision and practical, hands-on learning experiences. This will not only support students in mastering essential skills but also in transitioning seamlessly into professional roles within the civil engineering sector.

Criticism of Module Structure

A recurring theme in student feedback concerns the structure of certain modules within the civil engineering curriculum. Students often report that some modules are overly dense, packing a large amount of complex information into a short series of lectures. This method can hinder their understanding and retention of key concepts critical for their professional development. For example, topics such as fluid mechanics and structural analysis are extensive in scope and require a detailed and careful approach to teaching to ensure comprehension. Students suggest that splitting these large modules into smaller, more focused segments could substantially improve learning outcomes. This idea aligns with current educational research which supports modularisation as a means to enhance educational delivery by allowing more time for in-depth exploration of each topic and better alignment with student learning speeds. On the other hand, institutions must carefully consider the practical implications of such changes, including the scheduling challenges and the potential need for more resources. Balancing these factors is essential to avoid disruption while still aiming to address student concerns effectively. Engaging in continuous dialogue with students, perhaps through regular surveys, could provide staff with clear insights into how the module restructuring might best be implemented to benefit current and future cohorts.

Challenges of Online Learning

Addressing the specific obstacles faced by civil engineering students in adapting to online learning environments reveals a complex picture. One significant issue relates to timetabling, which often does not reflect the flexibility typically associated with digital learning. Synchronous sessions may clash with students' personal commitments or time zones, particularly for international students, causing considerable inconvenience. A further complication arises from instructions provided by non-native English speaking staff. While diversity in teaching staff can enrich the learning experience, it sometimes leads to clarity issues in online delivery, impacting students' ability to comprehend material effectively. These factors together can profoundly affect a student's learning process and overall satisfaction with the course. Students may feel less engaged if they struggle to connect with the course material due to these linguistic and scheduling barriers. Institutions must therefore consider these challenges carefully, looking into more adaptive timetabling and comprehensive language support to enhance the effectiveness of online learning in civil engineering programs. Utilising technology to facilitate better interaction between students and lecturers could also play a key role in mitigating some of these issues. For instance, recording live lectures and making them available for playback offers students the chance to revisit complex topics at their own pace. This flexibility is particularly crucial in a technical discipline like civil engineering, where concepts can often demand repeated review for mastery.

Desire for Practical and Engaging Learning

In the field of civil engineering education, there is a growing student demand for practical, hands-on learning experiences and assessments that draw directly from real-world challenges. Many civil engineering students express a desire to see more practical application of theory and more involvement in real-life projects as part of their coursework. This hands-on experience is seen as critical for their transition from academic settings into their future professional roles. For instance, integrating tasks such as site analysis using industry-standard software or collaborative projects to address actual engineering challenges can significantly enhance learning outcomes. In this context, it's also important to note the role of emerging technologies and software in the architectural, engineering and construction industries, which requires updated curriculum models to incorporate these tools effectively. The inclusion of practical training sessions and up-to-date software training provides a twofold benefit; it enhances student engagement and ensures graduates are industry-ready. On the other hand, while it is important to update and maintain technical relevance in teaching, institutions need to balance these modern requirements with the foundational theoretical knowledge that remains key to understanding and innovation in civil engineering. Effective educational delivery in civil engineering thus involves a delicate balance between theoretical underpinnings and practical application, tailored to keep pace with industry developments, while still fostering deep, fundamental understandings of the discipline.

The Overloading Issue in Lectures

A common concern among civil engineering students is the overloading of information in single lecture sessions. This issue not only makes it challenging for students to maintain concentration but also affects their ability to thoroughly understand and retain complex theories and concepts. The intensity of information presented can discourage students, who may feel overwhelmed by the sheer volume of data delivered in one go. On one hand, the depth of coverage is necessary given the complex nature of civil engineering topics such as structural integrity and materials science. Conversely, an overload can hinder effective learning, suggesting a re-think in how knowledge is partitioned across teaching sessions. Implementing a more segmented approach, with theoretical knowledge broken down into manageable chunks and complemented by practical, hands-on tutorials, could prove beneficial. This structure enables students to engage with information actively and apply their insights practically, which could notably improve comprehension and retention rates. Furthermore, integrating responsive teaching methods that adapt to student feedback on the pace and clarity of lectures can help staff to calibrate their teaching process more effectively, ensuring it aligns well with student capacity and learning goals.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In summarising the challenges and student feedback across civil engineering courses, it becomes apparent that several actionable steps could greatly enhance the delivery of teaching in this key discipline. Institutions should consider more dynamic and responsive teaching strategies that actively incorporate student input, particularly from course-specific surveys. These mechanisms not only gather invaluable insights but also foster an educational environment that aligns more closely with students' needs and the evolving demands of the engineering sector. For instance, adopting a more modular approach to course design can help break down complex information into more digestible parts, thus improving understanding and retention. Likewise, the integration of practical, real-world applications in teaching can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and professional requirements. It is also essential for academic staff to maintain a balance between developing digital competencies and ensuring foundational engineering principles are robustly taught. The teaching tools and methods must reflect both traditional and contemporary practices, preparing students thoroughly for future challenges in the industry. To support this, institutions might look into enhancing support structures around online learning platforms to address issues of accessibility and engagement. Overall, by continuously adapting teaching approaches and content based on direct student feedback and industry trends, civil engineering education can remain both current and rigorous, effectively preparing students for their future careers.

Student perspectives on teaching delivery in civil engineering

More posts on delivery of teaching:

More posts on civil engineering student views: