Is communication with academic staff working for management studies students?
Mostly, yes: the National Student Survey (NSS) shows a mildly positive tone in the communication with supervisors, lecturers and tutors theme (index +5.5), and students in management studies sit above that category average (+9.6). As a sector lens, the category captures how staff–student contact lands across providers and modes, while the CAH group frames the business and management discipline. In this story, those signals point to two priorities: make assessment communications unambiguous and stabilise operational updates, because feedback has a 9.6% share of management studies comments yet trends negative (−18.1), and scheduling/timetabling attracts negative tone (−27.3).
Effective communication between students and their supervisors, lecturers, or tutors shapes understanding, belonging and progress. Students value concise, substantive replies that help them navigate modules and assessments, and they notice when channels and response times are ambiguous. Where staff prioritise approachability and set expectations about how and when to get help, students engage more confidently with complex managerial concepts. Text analysis and student surveys provide a reliable read on where to tighten practice, supporting targeted improvements that reflect the dynamics of management education.
How does responsiveness shape learning in management studies?
Responsiveness drives momentum. Timely, substantive replies help students clarify topics, plan assessments and stay motivated; delays undermine progress and confidence. Set programme‑wide service standards for academic communication, with simple norms for “which channel for what” and “reply within X working days.” Publish office hours and back‑up contacts so students know who to approach when staff are away. Regular, precise updates from lecturers, tutors and supervisors reduce uncertainty and align expectations with real‑world application.
How do students experience lecturer interaction?
Students engage more when lecturers are approachable and explanations fit different starting points. Large cohorts and busy timetables can constrain time, so structure availability through predictable office hours, short drop‑ins and clear discussion forums on the VLE. Vary instructional methods, embed quick checks for understanding, and use brief recaps that separate “must‑know” from “nice‑to‑know.” These practices make complex areas in management accessible without diluting rigour.
What does good tutor responsiveness look like?
Set and monitor response‑time norms, and use predictable, asynchronous updates (weekly digests, recorded briefings) so students can catch up quickly. Offer out‑of‑hours slots around heavy assessment weeks to fit part‑time and work‑based learners. Proactive feedback on draft work and timely nudges before deadlines build confidence and reduce last‑minute queries. Where tutor loads are high, streamline triage (FAQs, named points of contact) so queries reach the right person first time.
How do we make assessment communication unambiguous?
Students repeatedly ask for clarity on expectations. Publish annotated exemplars, checklist‑style rubrics and concise marking guides; calibrate expectations across markers and state visible service levels for feedback turnaround. Use short briefing recordings alongside written assessment briefs, then check understanding in seminars. Follow up feedback sessions with a written summary of actions so students can apply advice in the next submission. These moves address the largest and most negative themes in management studies comments (Feedback 9.6% share; −18.1).
What should programme leaders standardise and signal?
Programme leadership should set the tone and rhythm of communication. Name a primary supervisor or advising contact for each student, standardise response‑time expectations across modules, and maintain a single source of truth on the VLE for timetables, assessment dates and changes. After any change, issue a brief “what changed and why” note to reduce confusion and rebuild trust. Review response‑time compliance and recurring issues at programme meetings and act within the current teaching block.
How can course administration reduce noise?
Operational clarity prevents academic disruption. Keep timetables stable, assign ownership for any change, and post updates in one place with deadlines and next steps. Provide early visibility of assessment windows, room moves and online session links to minimise last‑minute queries. Where placement or external activity occurs, coordinate with academic teams so students receive consistent messaging.
How can student support adapt to different cohorts?
Reduce barriers for disabled and mature students with alternative modes (captioned recordings, written summaries) and confirm adjustments in writing. Schedule short check‑ins at key assessment points. Apprentices and other time‑poor groups benefit from concise digests and asynchronous routes to help. Capture effective practices from areas with stronger tone and adapt them locally to close gaps.
What matters most now?
Prioritise assessment transparency and operational predictability, then embed simple service standards for staff–student communication. Students already recognise the value of accessible staff; sharpening expectations and closing loops on feedback and timetabling builds satisfaction and attainment in management studies.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text comments into clear priorities for management studies. It shows topic and sentiment trends for communication with academic staff over time, with drill‑downs by school, programme and cohort. You get like‑for‑like comparisons across CAH subject groups and demographics, and export‑ready summaries for programme boards and quick briefings. The platform helps teams act on what to fix now and what to scale, avoiding anecdote‑driven decisions.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutor:
- How well do computer science students communicate with supervisors, lecturers and tutors?
- Communication challenges in architecture education
- Do UK mental health nursing students face communication barriers?
- Are adult nursing students getting the staff communication they need?