Question and answer sessions in online tutorials
By Marisa Graser
Question and answer sessions (Q&A) are a great way for students to receive real-time feedback. However, retention rates in STEM subjects for these sessions are commonly low. Replacing them with online sessions has the promise to overcome this issue: For online tutorials, studies have found a greater attendance (Campbell et al., 2019) and the same improvement of final grades (Rennar-Potacco et al., 2019) when compared to face-to-face tutorials. Jansson et al. (2021) therefore conducted a study to see in which ways online Q&A sessions can benefit the students, in particular their inquiry processes.
How to implement text-based online Q&A
In their case study, Jansson et al. (2021) looked at online tutoring with integrated Q&A in a master’s course on advanced machine learning. The teachers set up a designated Q&A area in the University’s online environment. It consisted of a chat area, an interactive whiteboard that allowed the students to add content, for example freehand drawings, as well as the possibility to share files and images. All content in the Q&A area was automatically saved to allow students to revisit it, making synchronous as well as asynchronous engagement possible.
Before commencing, access and use of the Q&A room needs to be explained to the students. Jansson et al. (2021) then suggested scheduling a defined time when the teacher is available to answer questions online. However, students should also be encouraged to participate outside of these times.
Assessing online Q&A sessions with the Relationship of Inquiry Framework
To assess how effective this approach is on student learning, Jansson et al. (2021) analysed chat protocols based on the Relationship of Inquiry (RoI) framework (Stenbom et al. 2016). According to that, four elements are important to provide an ideal educational experience: Teaching presence, cognitive presence, social presence, and emotional presence.
Teaching presence can be delivered by the teacher or tutor as well as the students themselves. It includes the design and organisation of the session, facilitating discourse throughout, and providing direct instructions where necessary.
Cognitive presence means that students are encouraged to reflect and participate in discourse to give meaning to the delivered content.
Social presence allows students to identify with their course and peers, as well as to communicate openly. This is essential to develop collaboration, higher order thinking, and a secure climate where students feel like they can participate.
Social presence can be differentiated from emotional presence, where students express emotion, affect, and feeling when they engage.
When analysing these aspects, Janssen et al. (2021) highlighted a few aspects. Firstly, students frequently showed teaching presence, mostly towards their own process of inquiry. For example, they asked for help or explained what they had done. This meant that the teacher had a less dominant role compared to the standard setup of in-person Q&As. However, Janssen et al. (2021) noticed that students were still more engaged when they knew that the teacher was available and showed a higher synchronous participation.
Another interesting aspect was that whilst most students participated in the Q&A, students that did not actively engage in discussions were still online to follow other students’ questions and answers.
Social presence was also given as the concept of “we” was apparent in conversations. Emotional connections were also displayed through the use of emojis, expressing fears about upcoming assessments etc.
Benefits of online text-based Q&As
Overall, online Q&A Janssen et al.’s (2021) study confirmed that both students that ask questions and those that only read the answers and are less active can benefit from it (Bozkurt et al., 2020).
They also verified that online Q&A sessions were mostly student driven (Smith IV et al. 2020) where students were in charge of starting and ending conversations and keeping them going. This process was spontaneous, as students showed to seek their own development but also helped others to progress. This means that students learn to take responsibility for their own and other student’s learning and improve their metacognitive skills.
Finally, scheduled online Q&A sessions can also be beneficial for the instructor as time consuming office visits seem to be minimised (Kolluru et al., 2017). Some load is also taken off as other students can fill in answering redundant questions about deadlines, course structure, or other material that has already been provided.
FAQ
Q: How does student voice impact the effectiveness of online Q&A sessions in promoting deeper learning and engagement?
A: Student voice plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of online Q&A sessions, particularly in promoting deeper learning and engagement among students. When students actively participate by asking questions, sharing insights, and expressing concerns, they not only make their learning needs known but also contribute to a richer, more diverse learning environment. This active engagement helps in making the sessions more relevant and tailored to students' interests and queries, thereby fostering a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Moreover, when student voice is encouraged and valued, students are likely to feel more invested in their learning process, which can lead to higher motivation and engagement levels. The presence of student voice in online Q&A sessions signifies a shift from a teacher-centered approach to a more student-driven learning experience, where students have more control over their learning. This empowerment can enhance their critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as they learn to articulate their thoughts and questions more effectively.
Q: What are the challenges and limitations of text-based online Q&A sessions in capturing and analysing student voice?
A: Text-based online Q&A sessions face several challenges and limitations in capturing and analysing student voice effectively. One significant challenge is the difficulty in conveying tone, emotion, and nuance through text. Students' questions and responses might lack the depth of expression found in face-to-face interactions, making it harder for teachers to fully understand students' concerns or the intensity of their engagement. Furthermore, text analysis of student voice in these sessions may not accurately capture the full spectrum of student emotions or the subtleties of their engagement and learning experiences. Students with weaker writing skills or those who are less confident expressing themselves in writing may also be at a disadvantage, potentially leading to their voices being underrepresented in the analysis. Additionally, the asynchronous nature of some online Q&A interactions can lead to delayed responses, which might affect the flow of discussion and limit the immediacy of feedback, potentially dampening student engagement and the effectiveness of the learning experience.
Q: How can text analysis techniques be improved to better understand and support student inquiry processes in online Q&A sessions?
A: Improving text analysis techniques to better understand and support student inquiry processes in online Q&A sessions involves several strategies. Firstly, incorporating natural language processing (NLP) tools can help in identifying key themes, questions, and sentiment in student interactions more accurately. These tools can analyse large volumes of text data to detect patterns in student engagement, areas of confusion, and the emotional tone behind students' words, providing deeper insights into their learning experiences. Secondly, developing more sophisticated text analysis models that can interpret the nuances of language, including sarcasm, humour, and varying levels of question complexity, can enhance the understanding of student voice. This could involve training models on educational data or using machine learning to adapt to the specific linguistic styles and terminologies used in different academic contexts. Finally, integrating feedback mechanisms where students can confirm or clarify the interpretation of their queries and responses can help in refining the accuracy of text analysis. By continuously improving these techniques, educators can gain a more nuanced understanding of student inquiry processes, enabling them to tailor their teaching approaches and feedback more effectively to meet students' learning needs.
References:
A. Campbell, A.M. Gallen, M.H. Jones, A. Walshe. (2019) The perceptions of STEM tutors on the role of tutorials in distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34 (1), pp. 89-102.
DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2018.1544488
D. Rennar-Potacco, A. Orellana, P. Chen, A. Salazar. (2019) Rethinking academic support: Improving the academic outcomes of students in high-risk STEM courses with synchronous videoconferencing. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20 (4), pp. 455-474.
DOI: 10.1177%2F1521025116678854
M. Jansson, S. Hrastinski, S. Stenbom, F. Enoksson. (2021) Online question and answer sessions: How students support their own and other students' processes of inquiry in a text-based learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 51.
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100817
S. Stenbom, M. Cleveland-Innes, S. Hrastinski. (2016) Emotional presence in a relationship of inquiry: The case of one-to-one online math coaching. Online Learning, 20 (1), p. 41.
DOI: 10.24059/olj.v20i1.563
A. Bozkurt, A. Koutropoulos, L. Singh, S. Honeychurch. (2020) On lurking: Multiple perspectives on lurking within an educational community. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, p. 100709.
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100709
D. Smith IV, Q. Hao, V. Dennen, V. Dennen, M. Tsikerdekis, B. Barnes, et al. (2020) Towards Understanding Online Question & Answer Interactions and their effects on student performance in large-scale STEM classes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, p. 20.
DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00200-7
S. Kolluru, J.T. Varughese. (2017) Structured academic discussions through an online education-specific platform to improve pharm. D. students learning outcomes. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9 (2), pp. 230-236.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.022
Related Entries