Yes. Across the National Student Survey (NSS, the UK-wide survey of final-year undergraduates) open-text data for the personal tutor theme, 61.7% Positive, 36.0% Negative, 2.3% Neutral (≈1.71:1 positive:negative), signalling broad confidence in one-to-one academic support across the sector. In business and management subjects the tone sits at +22.3, with 57.4% positive and 39.4% negative. Within Business Studies, people-focused support outperforms assessment processes: Student support carries a +26.5 sentiment while Marking criteria runs at −43.1. Mode also shapes experience, with full-time students reporting a +32.0 index versus +22.4 for part-time, so providers that design predictable and flexible contact points see stronger outcomes. The personal tutor theme captures how students experience one-to-one academic support across UK higher education, while Business Studies is a large subject grouping used for sector benchmarking that brings applied, career-facing programmes into view.
At the heart of business students’ early academic journey sits personal tutoring. It frames how students navigate expectations, access staff, and develop confidence. We examine how tutorials, and the analysis of student comments, bring student voice into teaching and support. This is more than academic advice; it includes coaching on soft skills and transition. Personal tutors become a critical point of continuity, guiding academic progress and personal growth within a demanding discipline.
How does effective communication with personal tutors shape learning? Timely, constructive exchanges via email, in-person appointments and online meetings anchor the relationship. Students benefit when tutors provide prompt, substantive responses and schedule regular check-ins that map onto assessment and feedback cycles. Because full-time students report more positive tone than part-time, programmes should publish a simple service standard for response times and offer predictable out-of-hours slots and asynchronous options to protect access for those juggling work or care.
Why should support structures extend beyond academics? Students engage most when support spans study skills, wellbeing and career planning as well as module guidance. In Business Studies, people-centred topics carry positive tone, with strong sentiment around student support. Tutors who signpost services, normalise help-seeking and coordinate with advisers reduce friction and help students focus on learning. This holistic approach strengthens resilience and fosters a sense of belonging across a diverse cohort.
How does tutor engagement build strong relationships? Regular one-to-ones create space for students to surface concerns early, and for tutors to tailor advice by module, assessment brief and career intent. Using short pulse surveys and text analysis to spot recurring needs allows tutors to adjust their approach for the next cohort, closing the loop quickly. Consistent contact and approachable staff build trust and community, which in turn sustains engagement and persistence.
What role does feedback play in student development? Targeted, actionable feedback helps students understand what good looks like and how to improve. In Business Studies, students highlight transparency gaps in assessment, reflected in negative tone for Marking criteria (−43.1) and Feedback (−14.5). Programme teams can respond by publishing annotated exemplars, checklist-style rubrics that align to learning outcomes, and a credible feedback service level. Two-way dialogue matters: tutors should invite students to comment on usefulness and timing, then iterate.
Does availability of personal tutors affect satisfaction? Yes. Accessible booking, visible office hours and reliable response windows reduce anxiety around key stress points such as assessment periods and results release. Availability signals commitment and makes escalation routes straightforward. Students then use tutoring time for higher-value academic and developmental conversations rather than chasing basic information.
What responsibilities should personal tutors make explicit? Students engage more when they know what to expect. Set out the scope of tutoring, typical cadence of meetings, response norms and how tutors coordinate with module leaders and specialist services. Make “who to contact for what” obvious at induction and before major assessments, and keep role clarity consistent across the programme so students do not need to navigate multiple routes.
How can technology enhance personal tutoring? Blending online and on-campus touchpoints improves reach and flexibility, especially for commuting and working students. Short recorded recaps, shared action notes and clear signposting within the virtual learning environment enable continuity. Simple digital triage forms help tutors prioritise time-sensitive issues, while data from learning platforms and quick surveys highlight patterns that warrant proactive outreach.
How do international students benefit from personal tutors? International students often need help decoding UK academic conventions, language nuance in assessment briefs and expectations around independent study. Tutors who translate terminology, model assessment standards with examples and connect students to specialist language and careers support accelerate adaptation. Flexible online options also maintain contact across time zones and mitigate barriers to in-person attendance.
How can tutoring address course-specific issues in business studies? Personal tutors help students unpack complex content such as financial analysis, market research and strategic management by linking module concepts to applied tasks and sector contexts. They can scaffold work on sustainability, ethics and responsible management so that students see the wider implications of business decisions. This personalised approach strengthens conceptual understanding and prepares students for professional practice.
How does personal tutoring shape the overall university experience? Tutors act as navigators of institutional systems, connecting students to societies, mentoring, placements and study abroad. They help students interpret marking criteria, assessment feedback and progression rules, which reduces avoidable stress and improves confidence. Through consistent, human support, tutoring contributes to a cohesive experience that blends academic progress, personal development and a realistic view of career pathways.
What should institutions take from this? Evidence shows personal tutoring supports growth for Business Studies students when it is predictable, people-centred and assessment-literate. Positive tone around student support coexists with critique of assessment transparency, so aligning tutoring with assessment design and feedback practices delivers the biggest gains. Mode matters; protecting access for part-time and commuting students requires flexible touchpoints and clear standards.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you Student Voice Analytics surfaces what students actually say about personal tutoring and Business Studies across years. It shows topic and sentiment movement from provider to course, compares like-for-like by subject and demographics, and generates concise summaries for programme teams. Flexible segmentation and export-ready outputs make it straightforward to share priorities, track changes and evidence improvement against the right peer group.
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.