Are education students positive about remote learning?
Yes. Compared with the wider sector, education students view online delivery more positively, even though the National Student Survey (NSS) reads the remote learning picture as net negative overall (42.0% positive, 53.8% negative; sentiment index −3.4). Within that sector lens, Education reads more positive (+5.2), and the education cohort’s open‑text feedback is majority positive overall (55.4% positive). These patterns shape how programmes prioritise design, delivery and support for remote study on education degrees.
How should course structure support engagement online?
Use a tight weekly rhythm and purposeful blend of synchronous and asynchronous activity to sustain engagement. Students on education programmes respond well when modules use the same platform, predictable joining routes, and shorter live segments supported by signposted tasks. Asynchronous parity matters: provide recordings promptly with concise takeaways so those balancing work or caring responsibilities do not fall behind. Younger and full‑time cohorts tend to rate remote experiences less favourably than part‑time and mature peers, so keep interaction frequent but structured, and build in low‑stakes check‑ins. Routinely analyse discussion posts and quick‑pulse feedback to refine pacing, interaction and assessment alignment.
How do quality and accessibility of online resources affect learning?
Remote‑first materials remove hurdles. Caption recordings, provide transcripts and alt‑text, and offer low‑bandwidth versions. Host materials in a single, stable hub per module to reduce link churn. A short online orientation for new cohorts and a one‑page “how we work online” guide reduce early friction. Regular content reviews and student prompts for missing or inaccessible items ensure resources remain current and usable. Investing in digital infrastructure and basic equipment loans helps close access gaps that otherwise depress satisfaction and outcomes.
What do students say about breakout rooms?
Breakout rooms work when purpose and roles are explicit. Students report uneven participation and detachment if tasks are vague or facilitation is absent. Design small‑group activities with roles, milestones and output templates, and circulate expectations in advance. Light staff touchpoints, digital critique templates and rotating roles support equitable contributions. Monitoring patterns of participation helps identify barriers and adapt session design.
Where does flexibility and scheduling help—or hinder?
Flexibility enables education students—many of whom work alongside study—to manage competing demands, reduce commuting time and protect wellbeing. Yet self‑management can falter without scaffolding. Publish week‑by‑week expectations, avoid predictable assessment clustering, and provide optional study‑planning workshops. Maintain a single source of truth for timetable and delivery updates to protect the relative strengths education students report on scheduling and organisation.
How have dynamics between educators and students changed?
Online settings can humanise interaction but dilute cues that support authority and flow. Programme teams counter this by offering time‑zone‑aware office hours, setting predictable response times, and providing written follow‑ups for critical announcements. A consistent interaction model—what to use for what, and when—sustains rapport and reduces noise. Regular pulse checks on communication quality help staff adjust tone, frequency and channel.
How are interactions with instructors evolving?
Digital channels increase access to staff, but intention and boundaries matter. Education students value availability; they respond best when lecturers provide annotated exemplars, explicit assessment briefs and predictable feedback turnaround. Personal Tutors remain influential when touchpoints are proactive and documented, with clear escalation routes for academic support and wellbeing concerns.
What next for remote learning in education?
Focus on reliability and inclusion rather than novelty. Stabilise platforms and links, keep asynchronous parity, and monitor weekly friction points such as access issues and timetable slips. Close the loop with short “what we fixed” updates. Strengthen groupwork design, clarify marking criteria and align assessment methods to learning outcomes. Continued professional development in digital pedagogy and routine student‑led evaluation keep provision responsive.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Track remote learning themes and sentiment over time, with drill‑downs from provider to programme and cohort.
- Compare like‑for‑like by mode, age, domicile/ethnicity, disability and subject grouping to target support where it shifts the dial.
- Generate concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and governance, with export‑ready tables and charts.
- Evidence change by linking weekly fixes and termly actions to measurable movements in student comments and tone.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on remote learning:
- What does student feedback say about remote learning in computer science?
- Are applied psychology students positive about remote learning?
- Did remote learning work for drama students?
- What does student feedback say about remote learning in counselling, psychotherapy and occupational therapy?
More posts on education student views:
- Does wider module choice in education degrees improve student experience and career readiness?
- Are education students satisfied with how their courses are organised?
- What do education students say about student life at university?
- What improves communication between students and supervisors, lecturers and tutors in Education?